Translate

Friday, September 4, 2009

How deep into the gutter does one have to go to find dirt to vilify Sarah Palin ?

Being an immigrant and a non-white, I am always amazed at how white people can vilify their own kind but are ever so polite and proper when it comes to non-whites. In my immigrant's eyes, more than anything else, that attitude stinks of racism towards the immigrants.  Just the other day, I collided into a young guy at a subway station in my haste to board the train and the guy turned around in flaming anger with the start of an expletive on his lips, but on seeing my brown face he just smiled at my "sorry" and said "not to worry" and in fact said a "bye" to me when he left the train. I am willing to bet that would not have been his attitude had it been a white person that collided into him.

Imagine if Palin was a Latin American, or an African American or an Asian American, do you honestly believe the stings and barbs flung at her and her family would have happened ? When that Latin American woman was being appointed to one of the highest offices in the USA, was there any reference to her children? The criticism was all about the remarks she had made and that's that. In Palin's case the kind of remarks and behaviour from the left have now become fully toxic.

We know that the vile and dishonorable blog "Canadian Cynic" is managed by the utter dregs of the political blogging voices, and just when you thought this blog cannot go any lower into the stinking cesspool of Toronto's sewers, they attempt to set a new "low" level of sewage seepage by posting something from the smut media on the reprehensible Levi Johnston who is the father of Palin's first grandson.. This low-life Johnston has been spreading the vilest of rumours about Palin and her family and the Left has been grooming and pampering him just like they did with Cindy Sheehan. He is being paid 1000s of dollars for posing nude in a girlie magazine which is actually a hot sell with the male gay population and this kind of smut media is what the dregs at "Canadian Cynic" seem to digest all in a fervor of excitement like they never did their text books during their actual educative years, if they actually had any education that is.

Many of the feminist blogs in the USA  have links to the kind of people and the kind of money Johnston has been making after stepping out of Alaska. The wacko is being manipulated by the Left and whatever "pearls" of lies that fall out of his mouth that can possible vilify Palin are quickly caught in the palms of Palin haters and swiftly strung into the most expensive of Pearl Necklaces. They then wear those necklaces in all the smut and yellow rags and the bloggers at "Canadian Cynic" dive deeper into the sewers to find those pearls and having found  them they come up for breath, holding those dirty pearls between their teeth  and then they start spewing the dirt that has collected in their mouths in their tryst to find the pearls, by vilifying Palin.

A new low for "Canadian Cynic".  It is now officially a "smut and yellow" blog.

16 comments:

  1. It's funny how that "reverse discrimination" that you have just described as, if I understood your post, a dishonest expression of politeness towards brown-skinned persons by beige-skinned persons who would otherwise savage them, works.

    Interesting how conservatives who fear and loathe Barack Obama aren't held back by such civilities when they freely vilify him and his family.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nah, it's just as likely that he turned around and saw a middle aged woman who is fighting a losing battle with her waistline. Ageism and sexism are a powerful combination, how people always assume that middle-aged women aren't purposely physically intrusive.

    ReplyDelete
  3. deBeauxOs - "freely vilify him and his family" ?!!!!!!!!!
    What are you talking about.
    I don't see anything that says Obama and his wife are getting a divorce; I don't see anything that says they are fighting constantly; I don't see anything that says his daughters are sluts; I don't see anything that says he prefers one child to another, I don't see anything about his family or about him as a person. However, it is just the other way around for Palin. The attack on her as a person and on her family is merciless and even a blind person can see it.

    I see a lot of criticism for the blunders and the lies he has been making and telling, nothing about his family. When a newspaper said something silly about his wife's shorts, conservatives came out in hordes to defend her and her choice of dress. Is that what you had in mind, that conservatives were vilifying Obama's family.
    Don't hit your tongue to the roof of your mouth just because you want to say something. If you have proof that conservatives have gone after his kids, provide it, otherwise hold your tongue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zoe - I hope that tiny little kernel inside your skull which you wrongfully assume to be your brain, can handle the fact that middle-age in humans can mean anywhere between 35 to 65 and "fighting a losing battle with a waistline" can mean a waist anywhere between 24-inch waist to a 34-inch waist for a female. Don't let the misconceptions of that tiny noodle inside your skull give you false perceptions of people who don't put up their pictures on their blogs.
    Idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Dodo.

    I guess you didn't see this story in the Vancouver Sun from not too long ago: "Conservative Free Republic Blog in Free Speech Flap After Racial Slurs Directed At Obama Children". Racial slurs, plus things like "street whore", "ghetto trash"... plus, these are public-school-age children that these fine upstanding "conservatives" were dumping on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you have proof that conservatives have gone after his kids, provide it, otherwise hold your tongue.

    Done. That was easy.

    Unless for some reason you'd like to claim that LibrulFreiRepubliKKK isn't a conservative web site. Which is perfectly fine by me. Zombie Jesus knows we need more wingnut circular firing squads.

    ReplyDelete
  7. jj - I read only the first few lines in the link you provided, and YES those remarks targeting a kid are truly disgusting. The conservatives I know and move around with are not the kind of people to even think such things.
    After reading the concept of "diamond pattern" (and you can find it as one of my posts), I would like to think that the Left has planted these vile comments at the Free Republic blog to make it look like conservatives have done it. At least I would like to believe that, and you should also take that as a possibility.

    ReplyDelete
  8. JaBbering Stooge - good link. Will finish reading a bit later. My response is as given to jj above.
    Even if these horrid comments were made by the USA conservatives, they were made by some hillbillies on some blog and should not be taken as equal to the articles written by "paid" journalists in newspapers and magazines like Huffington Post and others where paragraph after paragraphs give vent to washing Palin's entire family's "imagined" dirty laundry.
    Like I conveyed to jj, I strongly suspect that leftists, in the guise of being conservatives, leave derogatory comments on conservative blogs to play mischief. Read my post on "What is a "diamond pattern"?

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's shameful that anyone would go after Barack Obama's children -- or Bill Clinton's children, or anyone else's.

    Including Richard Evans' children.

    Anyone else remember Robert Peter John Day's "stalk Dick Evans' kids for me" challenge?

    I know I do.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Patrick Ross - I have let your comment through, but please let's not carry it any further. I do not know the history of your accusation as I am a newbie to the blogging world but I have let you let off some steam by publishing the comment.
    Anybody who wants to discuss this with Patrick Ross, please note, I will not publish the comments so do not bother.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lindsay Stewart - I am willing to bet you initially spelled "potato" as "potatoe" and thanks to your spellcheck you got rid of the "e".
    Now go spill your guts in your vomit ridden blog about what a "w"itch I am.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You realize, of course, that the OED defines middle age as being between 45-60 (ie: the usual age of menopause for women)? Regardless, I still don't see how that refutes my point about middle-aged females and how they are treated socially compared to, say, strapping young men. If could also be race, but since I've had similar experiences and I'm the colour of bleached Gyproc, I think not. But as we all know, your insulting and fact-free diatribe obviously renders invalid anything I have to say.

    (Oh, and hey, just a suggestion, maybe you should try describing yourself to the Internet using your actual accomplishments, instead of your waistline? Unless you're a fitness instructor - and a bad one, if you're, as you say, failing to stay in shape - I really don't see how its relevant. Just a thought.)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Dodo.
    "I would like to think that the Left has planted these vile comments at the Free Republic blog to make it look like conservatives have done it. At least I would like to believe that, and you should also take that as a possibility."

    Well, anything's possible, I guess. But if lefty trolls were responsible for the racist comments, I'm surprised that Free Republic wouldn't ban them. Those same commenters that made the vile racist remarks about Obama's kids are still posting there, to this day, unscathed by the ban-hammer.

    Anything's *possible*, but I think I'll go with what's *probable* -- that there's a virulent subculture of conservatives who are nothing but racist scum.

    Just my .02.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sfs - infantile. Couldn't you come up with something a little better. Now go change those dirty pampers instead of playing with the muck therein.
    Lefties ... sheesh ... they never learn. The faulty university education they have received from short circuited professors, is blaringly transparent every time they try to utter something they presume to be witty or wise or insulting. Sad, so sad.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.