Translate

Friday, May 27, 2011

Charles Krauthammer on Obama's betrayal of Israel

He does not call what Obama did "betrayal". I am calling it so. I am in the midst of reading "The Grand Jihad..How Islam and the Left Sabotage America" by Andrew McCarthy and am beginning to understand how committed Obama is to the destruction of America as it stands today. Inciting the moslem hordes do away with one of America's greatest allies is just the start of a long and cherished dream he has, unfortunately for us, it is our nightmare.

Every Arab-Israeli negotiation contains a fundamental asymmetry: Israel gives up land, which is tangible; the Arabs make promises, which are ephemeral. The long-standing American solution has been to nonetheless urge Israel to take risks for peace while America balances things by giving assurances of U.S. support for Israel's security and diplomatic needs.

It's on the basis of such solemn assurances that Israel undertook, for example, the Gaza withdrawal. In order to mitigate this risk, President George W.Bush gave a written commitment that America supported Israel absorbing major settlement blocs in any peace agreement, opposed any return to the 1967 lines and stood firm against the so-called Palestinian right of return to Israel.

For 21 / 2 years, the Obama administration has refused to recognize and reaffirm these assurances. Then last week in his State Department speech, President Obama definitively trashed them. He declared that the Arab-Israeli conflict should indeed be resolved along "the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps."

Nothing new here, said Obama three days later. "By definition, it means that the parties themselves — Israelis and Palestinians — will negotiate a border that is different" from 1967.

It means nothing of the sort. "Mutually" means both parties have to agree. And if one side doesn't? Then, by definition, you're back to the 1967 lines. .................

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.