They have allowed the terrorists they fund and arm to use chemical weapons at the same time that Assad's air force was targeting pockets of Damascus suburbs heavy with jihadis. That's how easy it is to blame Assad's army for atrocities done at the command of the West. To all appearances it will look like Assad has used chemical weapons along with the conventional ones. Does it make sense to you that Assad would use chemical weapons just when he has given full access to a team of UN delegated scientists investigating the earlier claims of chemical weapons used by the regime? Does it make sense that just when most of the terrorist gangs were almost beaten, he decides to use chemical weapons?
OR does it make sense that an entity other than Assad's army has done this.?
At Reuters article detailing the number of deaths, description and stating that "according to the opposition" the sarin gas came from Assad, it's easy to see that the commentors to the article are not fooled.
Below are some of the comments, and almost all are in the same vein. Goes to show people are not as dumb as our government wants us to be:
fnpmitchreturns wrote:
Operation Gladio has never stopped and it is continuing in Syria and throughout the Middle East today. I have no doubt that it was the rebels and their NATO allies who are using the gas as an attempt to make Assad look like the bad man…… Is this a typical false flag operation by ALciadia
Assad is fighting off modern day Nazis with an ideology of war and destruction… shame on the US and NATO….. However, when will the people realize that NATO is just a military arm of the banker/military industrial complex…
Aug 21, 2013 7:54am EDT -- Report as abuse
lex_70 wrote:
Is there no limit to how low NATO/GCC will sink?…. This must be their saddest, most despicable and desperate act yet.
This whole charade was exposed long ago by RET GEN WESLEY CLARK and FMR FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTER ROLAND DUMAS.
Aug 21, 2013 7:05am EDT -- Report as abuse
neill999 wrote:
I agree with Lex.
This is a desperate attempt to drag the West/NATO into a war on the side of Al-Qaeda.
The Syrian government is winning this war against the Al-Qaeda backed rebels. They have no reason to use chemical weapons as the rebels are getting desperate.
Aug 21, 2013 7:26am EDT -- Report as abuse
Renbe wrote:
Sure, after months of the one victory after the other, and a few days after the UN team arrives, the Syrian Army decides to gas a few hundred women and children.
Aug 21, 2013 7:26am EDT -- Report as abuse
acpa4u wrote:
I would suspect the al Qaeda backed rebels for this. Obama, again, has backed the wrong side.
Aug 21, 2013 7:49am EDT -- Report as abuse
ajay321 wrote:
How convenient, attack when UN team in Syria. Does U.K. and USA think world is so dumb?
Aug 21, 2013 8:28am EDT -- Report as abuse
Phillgrace wrote:
Let’s put this into perspective. If the DEA was in your living room searching for drugs, would you be in the back bedroom smoking pot? Hell no you wouldn’t. I don’t have all the facts, but I do have common sense, and it doesn’t fit that Assad would chemically attack his own while there is a team just a few miles for that very purpose investigating use of chemical weapons. Think about it. I’m not swallowing this hook so readily, i don’t care how good the bait is.
Aug 21, 2013 9:10am EDT -- Report as abuse
BruceBanner wrote:
People aren’t as gullible as they were in 1990 with “Nayirah” testifying before the U.S. Congress how those evil Iraqi soldiers took babies out of incubators in Kuwait and left them to die on the floor (“casus belli” always needs to make the “Enemy” look inhuman).
In 1992, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was al-Ṣabaḥ and that she was the daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Furthermore, it was revealed that her testimony was organized as part of the Citizens for a Free Kuwait public relations campaign which was run by Hill & Knowlton for the Kuwaiti government. Following this, al-Sabah’s testimony has largely come to be regarded as wartime propaganda.
The anti-Assad criminals are desperate – they need a home run to get weapons and money NOW, before they are wiped out.
Aug 21, 2013 9:16am EDT -- Report as abuse
covington.13 wrote:
Jesus Christ guys, this is obviously a false flag! Why would Assad do this when the momentum of the war is on his side and there are weapons inspectors right there? It would just give the US justification to intervene. On the other hand, the rebels have every reason to do it and blame it on Assad, they definitely want the US to get involved!
Aug 21, 2013 9:25am EDT -- Report as abuse
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.