Sunday, November 29, 2020

Wow!! Portugal's justice system gives verdict that PCR tests are up to 97% unreliable.

 If I posted this link on the twitter platform, its algorithms would block me as has been happening almost every day with my tweets posted there.  I am now more active at this blog with article that are of interest and should be widely read (at least by the few dozen who visit this blog) :) :) 

I loved the part of the verdict where the judges said that a DOCTOR should examine a patient to declare that the patient is infected and we know that all those who are presumed infected are NOT diagnosed by doctors but by TESTERS not qualified to be doctors.

 Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centred on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.

The verdict, delivered on November 11, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four Germans against the Azores Regional Health Authority. This body had been appealing a ruling from a lower court which had found in favour of the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel over the summer after one of them tested positive for coronavirus in a PCR test - the other three were labelled close contacts and therefore made to quarantine as well.

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one...........................

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.