Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 .... what's in a name?

The 1%ters have all the money in the world to find ways and means to screw us the 99%.
 

Someone is dead set against the NWO !!

Putin addresses the Valdai business forum.  I am into the first few minutes,  but the little  I have heard so far is very interesting. 

New bio-weapon from the ever generous America

What could go wrong with a bio-weapon that can render the human immune system completely powerless, eh?  Nothing!  Only a few million tonnes of less weightage from the earth's surface. That's what the powers-that-be probably have in mind.

From IndependentUK:
....Exclusive: Controversial US scientist creates deadly new flu strain for pandemic research.

Scientists express horror over the creation of a virus that could render the human immune system defenceless.

A controversial scientist who carried out provocative research on making influenza viruses more infectious has completed his most dangerous experiment to date by deliberately creating a pandemic strain of flu that can evade the human immune system.

Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin-Madison has genetically manipulated the 2009 strain of pandemic flu in order for it to “escape” the control of the immune system’s neutralising antibodies, effectively making the human population defenceless against its reemergence.

Most of the world today has developed some level of immunity to the 2009 pandemic flu virus, which means that it can now be treated as less dangerous “seasonal flu”. However, The Independent understands that Professor Kawaoka intentionally set out to see if it was possible to convert it to a pre-pandemic state in order to analyse the genetic changes involved.......

The Libya that was and the USA-led NATO created Utopia of today

There are all kind of bullies. You have seen them in schools and you have seen them as bosses ... but the ones who do the maximum damage are the bullies found in  NATO under the guardianship of the USA. 
It saddens me that Canada had joined the crooks of NATO in this terrible mistake.  Hopefully, the next Prime Minister of Canada will not be a warmongering, regime changer, coup enabler like the ex-superstar Stephen Harper.

In the last few days, many of the Muslim conspirators (traitors) who aligned with the USA and NATO in Iraq and in Libya have been targeted.  I can't say I feel sorry for them.  You can't invite outsiders to come bomb your own people .... no matter how bad it is internally in your country, one has to try to make it better instead of relying on outside forces which often prove to be nothing but malignant towards your country.



Eric Draitser writing at NewEasternOutlook:
....More than three years after the US and its NATO allies unleashed an “intervention” and regime change in Libya, the US establishment admits they maybe have “got it wrong.” Naturally, there were many of us who were demonized endlessly for speaking out against that war, and against all those politicians, analysts, and “activists” on the left and right, who championed the “humanitarianism” of waging war on Libya. We were attacked as “soft on dictators,” “conspiracy theorists,” and “anti-Americans.” And yet, today it is our voices that still proclaim loudly the immorality and illegality of that war. Thankfully, it seems the establishment is beginning to hear us.

One of the most highly regarded politico-academic institutions in the US – the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University – has issued a report which undermines the established narrative of the war in Libya, laying bare the cold, hard reality of what Libya was at the outset of the war, what really happened in the early days, and what Libya has become today. Of course, responsibility for the tragic and lasting effects of that war should be laid at the feet of Obama, Cameron, Sarkozy, and the other participants, in addition to those media outlets and NGOs that deliberately spread lies about the reality on the ground in Libya. All must be held accountable.


The recent report, which is actually almost a year old, was written by Dr. Alan Kuperman, Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin. Dr. Kuperman attempts to shed light on some of the key aspects of disinformation before and during the war in Libya. These important findings contradict every single justification for that war, from the lies and distortions of Samantha Power, Susan Rice, and Hillary Clinton, to the deluge of propaganda from so-called NGOs such as Human rights Watch and Amnesty International. By examining the obfuscations and outright lies told by these individuals and organs of soft power, Dr. Kuperman makes it quite clear that, just as with Iraq, the people of the United States (and much of the world) have been lied into yet another war.



One of the principal lies told about Libya and Gaddafi was the totally unsubstantiated claim of “massacres” by Gaddafi forces in Benghazi and a few other cities. This claim, perpetrated by Human Rights Watch among others, was repeated ad nauseam by every major media outlet. As Dr. Kuperman writes:

Contrary to Western media reports, Qaddafi did not initiate Libya’s violence by targeting peaceful protesters. The United Nations and Amnesty International have documented that in all four Libyan cities initially consumed by civil conflict in mid-February 2011—Benghazi, Al Bayda, Tripoli, and Misurata—violence was actually initiated by the protesters. The government responded to the rebels militarily but never intentionally targeted civilians or resorted to “indiscriminate” force, as Western media clai med. Early press accounts exaggerated the death toll by a factor of ten, citing “more than 2,000 deaths” in Benghazi during the initial days of the uprising, whereas Human Rights Watch (HRW) later documented only 233 deaths across all of Libya in that period.

These are indeed significant facts that merit further examination as they completely contradict the standard narrative of the war in Libya and, most importantly, the justifications for it. First and foremost is the question of who initiated violence. The talking points in Western media all through early 2011 held that Gaddafi was “murdering his own people,” and that this justified a humanitarian intervention, to “help the people of Benghazi.” However, the hitherto suppressed truth is that it was the violent “protesters” (who should rightly be referred to as terrorists within the protests) who actually initiated the violence, using protesters as human shields........

Jon Lee Anderson writing at the NewYorker:
....On June 25th, in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi, the lawyer and democracy activist Salwa Bugaighis was killed, bringing despair to those who knew her. Bugaighis, a bright, funny, courageous woman, fifty years old, was fighting for a democratic, open society. Along with her husband, Issam, and her sister Iman, she was at the forefront of the uprising against Muammar Qaddafi; later, she sat on the hastily declared transitional council that sought to bring order to the excited anarchy that followed Qaddafi’s fall.

As that anarchy turned to bedlam, Bugaighis worked to reconcile Libya’s feuding groups—even as her life was threatened, and as other critics of the militias were murdered. She had been spending time abroad, because of such threats, but came home for the elections.Yesterday, just after she returned from voting in parliamentary elections, gunmen surprised her at her house and shot her to death. Issam, who was abducted in the incident, is still missing. A Libyan friend of Bugaighis told me, “I am shocked beyond words. Sometimes I think that we just fucked up by removing Qaddafi—that I would rather live under a dictator and not worry about the safety of my family.”.............................

New World Order starts in earnest with Ukraine fiasco

Lecturer and author, F William Engdahl's Interview below is full of information.

A thought just popped up after something he said ... where are all the American mercenaries that landed in Ukraine from that company that keeps changing its name?  Remember the vids we had seen and the news we had read in March.
Hmmmm ... wonder where all those talented killers are hiding.  Or was that just propaganda from the Russians?  Anything is possible. There are no decent guys in this.  Putin, Obama, the coup govt, EU leaders, Harper ... all rogues. 

Nevada rancher makes a stand and gets plenty of support ..

from like-minded people, especially when they see how the govt. thugs bully the women and taser spray the rancher's son.  


update: ....Feds Back Down From Bundy Siege After Infowars Exposé of Chinese Land Grab.  

Bob Livingston  writing at PersonalLiberty:
Federal Cattle Rustlers At Work In Nevada.      
You want to see what tyranny looks like? Look into the faces of these two Bureau of Land Management goons. It’s a shot taken from the video below.
In Clark County, Nev., rancher Cliven Bundy has refused to comply with orders from Federal judges to remove his cattle from land the BLM claims is Federal land and habitat for an endangered tortoise — a tortoise the Federal government has routinely killed. It’s land the Bundy family has grazed cattle on since the 1800s — land Bundy believes belongs to the State of Nevada, not the Feds. It’s land Bundy claims he has ancestral grazing rights for, which, if so, cannot be undone simply by an order from a Federal judge.
“My forefathers have been up and down the Virgin Valley ever since 1877. All these rights I claim have been created through pre-emptive rights and beneficial use of the forage and water. I have been here longer. My rights are before the BLM even existed,” Bundy said.......

US govt. stealing private land .....

on pretext of saving wildlife like turtles, snakes, grasshoppers, etc.  Yeah ... better believe it folks.  It's happening all under the guise of "saving" life.  Animal life is more important than human life.  Live with it!

A Waco-like situation in the making ...and murmurings of an American Spring

Big government at its worst.  I won't be surprised if this is  the start of the first shots at the govt to show the American discontent with their elected officials and the big blasted government bullies. America is so ripe for another civil war.  There I said it  ... without giving a shit about what anybody thinks of me and my big mouth.

Henry Brean writing at ReviewJournal:
....The Bureau of Land Management quietly dismantled its so-called “First Amendment areas” in northeastern Clark County on Thursday, as the fight over Cliven Bundy’s cattle widened into a national debate about states’ rights and federal land-use policy.

State lawmakers from Arizona to Washington are headed for Nevada to rally alongside the Bundy family and its supporters. Most of them are tea party Republicans or Libertarians associated with a patriot group known as the Oath Keepers.

Several of the elected officials said they were drawn into the issue by video footage of Wednesday’s clash between angry protesters and BLM rangers that shows Bundy’s sister being tackled to the ground and one of Bundy’s seven sons being shot with a stun gun.

“Watching that video last night created a visceral reaction in me,” said Arizona Rep. Kelly Townsend, a tea party Republican who is driving up from Phoenix to take part in a rally with lawmakers and Oath Keepers near the Bundy ranch Monday. “It sounds dramatic, but it reminded me of Tiananmen Square. I don’t recognize my country at this point.”

Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore, R-Las Vegas, called the footage “horrifying.” The pro-gun lawmaker has made two trips to the Bunkerville area in the past two days so she could meet with protesters, “protect our Nevadans and keep the peace.”...........

From CBSNews:
  ....A confrontation in Nevada  threatens to become a modern-day range war. The government is taking away a rancher's herd, and tensions are running high.

Rancher Cliven Bundy said his land has been in his family since the 1870s, Teri Okita reports. In his mind, he's not just fighting against some unfair fees. He said he's trying to keep Uncle Sam out of everyone's backyard.........



From WND:
....With his Nevada ranch   surrounded by helicopters, four-wheel-drive vehicles and an estimated 200 armed officers of the federal Bureau of Land Management, Cliven Bundy is drawing support from the governor and other prominent political leaders along with a host of protesters from other states, including fellow cattle ranchers and private armed militias.

At least three people have been arrested, and militias have made the confrontation over Bundy’s use of federal land for grazing a rally cry.....



From FoxNews:
...William La Jeunesse brought us the latest this morning on the standoff between a Nevada rancher and the federal government. The dispute centers on cattle belonging to 68-year-old Cliven Bundy.

The Bureau of Land Management says the cattle are grazing on federal land and more than 100 have been seized by authorities...........

De-population in the works. Hard to believe isn't it?

Agenda 21  .... it's not a conspriracy.  It's an elaborate tool designed to control you even further. And, its about time you learnt more about it if you haven't already.



More here,  here    here, and lots more on the net.  

Before the activity by the NSA on the private lives of world leaders came to light ... would you have believed if somebody had told you that even world leaders' private lives are being monitored by the USA?  Don't be shocked or surprised by the satanic activists who want to de-populate the world of humans. Just as so much evil happen under the guise of "social justice"  so do many similar acts happen under the guise of "Agenda 21" or the myriad of other titles they have given the same old plan ... all of which are supposed to bring the world's population as one whole entity, and that is supposedly to be done because we are good people and want to look after those less unfortunate than us by us getting to the level of the less fortunate.  

Our schools are already following part of the plan. Nobody is at the top of the classroom just as nobody is at the bottom.  All get the same grades. A "pass" or a "fail".  It's communism molded to look like democracy. 

As far as I am concerned .... I am suspicious of anything and everything that says "green"  because that's a color that's numero uno in islam...... and many of the organizations connected to Agenda 21 are using "green" in their verbiage. 

Rosa Koire, an activist against Agenda 21 has written on the plan and she's titled the book "Behind the Green Mask". Worth listening to what she has to say.

FACT: The Bilderberg Group was the architect of the European Union

While still searching  for the document I had read which would  "make it possible for a delegate from the United Nations to act as interim "President" or "Prime Minister" of any country"  ...  I am coming across other interesting stuff.

The first three links below have enough information to tell us that the  Bilderberg gang was responsible for the birth of the EU.  Once an idea is "bounced around" in this dangerous cauldron of  rich and powerful world manipulators, no country has a chance....leave alone individuals these wizards and witches think can be dealt with by labeling them  "conspiracy theorists".

The rest of the info is pretty fascinating too.  There were 6 Canadian biggies at the latest Stink Tank conference in the UK.  I believe the group decided to put up a website (has the most minimal info within it) only about 2 years ago after those vile "conspiracy theorists" kept snapping at their heels.

This group is supposed to "bounce around" ideas and stuff that are a concern to mainly the North American and EU countries .... so how come  the agendas (only the last 3 years lists available) does not have a single item which is of the SINGLE MOST NUMERO UNO CONCERN we have?  You know what that is, right?  The  MUSLIM invasion!   Until and unless these individuals sitting in those  meetings and thinking of themselves as brainiacs most supreme,  unless they talk about actively putting a stop to Muslim immigration, they are to be considered as the main pushers for a one world order.  If they were not,  then they would clearly see that the Muslim culture is simply not compatible with the Western culture and they would "bounce around" the idea of putting a FULL STOP to Muslim immigration to the West.

From EUObserver:
...A meeting in June in Europe of the Bilderberg Group - an informal club of leading politicians, businessmen and thinkers chaired by Mr Davignon - could also "improve understanding" on future action, in the same way it helped create the euro in the 1990s, he said.
"When we were having debates on the euro, people [at Bilderberg events] could explain why it was worth taking risks and the others, for whom the formal policy was not to believe in it, were not obliged not to listen and had to stand up and come up with real arguments."......

From TheTelegraphUK:
...Former leading members tell the Telegraph it was the most useful meeting they ever went to and it was crucial in forming the European Union. ....
..... Would the European Union and single currency have taken the shape they have now without those early Bilderberg meetings, I ask him.
“I think it was a very important element in it. Whether it would have happened without it is difficult to say,” he says.
Other accounts suggest the annual meeting can be decisive.......
.......“Lots of the stuff written about it is a load of crap,” says Lord Healey of Riddleden, who served as Chancellor to Harold Wilson and James Callaghan. He would know. He attended the first Bilderberg meeting in 1954 and sat on the steering committee for forty years.
“Those who weren’t invited were very jealous. Some people described it as a secret Communist organisation. Others said it was a secret American organisation. But it was balls.”
For much of the post-War era Healey helped set the agenda and chose the delegates. He is proud of their record in spotting future leaders. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair were invited early in their careers. “The steering committee, because of their wide range of backgrounds, made some very good choices,” he says......

More here at Infowars.

Canadians at 2013 session of the Bilderberg gang:

CAN Clark, W. Edmund President and CEO, TD Bank Group
CAN McKenna, Frank Chair, Brookfield Asset Management
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. Chair, Torys LLP
CAN Reisman, Heather M. CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
CAN Wall, Brad Premier of Saskatchewan
CAN Weston, Galen G. Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited

What  the Bilderberg Meetings website says about themselves:

Founded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America.Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; one third from politics and government and the rest from other fields.The conference is a forum for informal, off-the-record discussions about megatrends and the major issues facing the world.Thanks to the private nature of the conference, the participants are not bound by the conventions of office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights.There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.The 61st Bilderberg meeting will take place at the beginning of June 2013 in the UK.

Agenda items
31 May-3 June 2012 Chantilly, Virginia, USA
The State of Trans-Atlantic Relations
Is Vigorous Economic Growth Attainable?
The Future of Democracy in the Developed World
The US Political Landscape
The European Political Landscape
A Conversation on US Foreign Policy
The Politics and Geo-Politics of Energy
Stability and Instability in the Middle East
Imbalances, Austerity and Growth
Sustainability of the Euro and its Consequences
What Does Putin 2.0 Mean?
What Can the West Do about Iran?
How Do Sovereign States Collaborate in Cyber Space?
China's Economic and Political Outlook

The key topics for discussion for 2013 meeting:
•    Can the US and Europe grow faster and create jobs?
•    Jobs, entitlement and debt
•    How big data is changing almost everything
•    Nationalism and populism
•    US foreign policy
•    Africa’s challenges
•    Cyber warfare and the proliferation of asymmetric threats
•    Major trends in medical research
•    Online education: promise and impacts
•    Politics of the European Union
•    Developments in the Middle East
•    Current affairs

One World Government ... Is it a plan to end all our troubles?

Yeah, right !!!  
The One-World-govt. or Agenda 21 as it is known,  is a ploy devised by the powerful  to empower the already too powerful.  It's nothing but a ploy hatched by politicians and the puppet masters who have politicians on a string  like Soros and his ilk ... it's a ploy devised to take away individual freedoms and control the masses in one fell swoop.  Don't fall for it no matter how benign and all  for the  "benefit of the underprivileged"  that it's made to sound.  The TPP is just one of the many, many instruments that will be used to  join up with other instruments (some of them already in place)  for enabling the full assembly of the ultimate plan which will let a few hundred extremely powerful individuals rule the world.

John F.McManus writing at TheJohnBirchSociety:
....Beware the Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Pact.  The TPP is a vehicle for Asia-Pacific-wide economic integration.

If Henry Kissinger and Richard N. Gardner told you they wanted to destroy our nation’s independence via a “piecemeal” approach while calling their treachery something else, wouldn’t you be on guard? Wouldn’t you watch for and oppose them, their allies, and their plans as they place pieces into a mosaic that will become a world government? Of course you would. Well, they and numerous others have boldly told us what they intend, have already taken several steps toward achievement of the overall goal, and surely delight in seeing their nightmarish dreams moving toward fulfillment.

Some of the pieces of this world government mosaic have already been created. NAFTA is perhaps the most important. But another, the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) offered by both President Bill Clinton and President George W. Bush, ran into a substantial roadblock erected by The John Birch Society. It is no longer being promoted and something else has taken its place. Now there’s a need to create another roadblock, one needed to stop America’s entry into a proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership free-trade agreement.

Remaining faithful to the piecemeal approach, individuals promoting the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have successfully entwined the following nations in negotiations toward the overall goal: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, and the United States. Representatives of each of these nations will meet in Auckland, New Zealand, during December 3-12, 2012, for the 15th round of TPP negotiations. The purpose of their gathering is to cement agreement about a formal TPP trade pact in the near future.

Trade pact? How could anyone be opposed to a trade pact? The answer, very simply, is that economic integration is always followed by political integration. Is economic integration the initial goal of the TPP? Indeed it is, and that goal is so stated in the “Trans- Pacific Partnership Frequently Asked Questions” section of the official website of the the United States Trade Representative (http://www.ustr.gov/tpp), which candidly states: “The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a vehicle for Asia-Pacific-wide economic integration.” 

Further indicating TPP’s goal, the group’s organizers boldly discussed the “vision of negotiating a high-standard, 21st century regional agreement.” In other words, the TPP conference in New Zealand is a grand step toward gaining nation-by-nation approval of another sovereignty-compromising trade agreement.

As stated by proponents of this latest attack on national sovereignty, the bait being used to build sentiment toward an eventual Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement is “jobs, economic growth, and long-term prosperity.” This is exactly what lured 27 nations in Europe to enter into the European Union. None were told that they were joining a sovereignty- compromising political group, but many Europeans now realize that this is precisely what happened. It will surely happen to the United States and other nations if their leaders continue down the rosy path being laid out for them by the TPP..................

Lots of human chunks courtesy the Religion of Pieces ....

as the tally from July 6 - 10 shows.   Nigeria continues killing Christians while the infidels' governments in North America and elsewhere makes sure that the coffers of the Nigerian government are kept to the brim with funds obtained by taxing us infidels.  Afghanistan is happy with the 16 Billion Dollars aid that the OneWorldGovt has provided it and is showing how those dollars are working on behalf of  us stupid taxpayers, a large majority of whom are forced by our governments against our will to fund the worst governments around the world.   
Afghanistan is taking the infidels of the world on one groovy ride.   Let's just sit back and enjoy the sights, we have paid for the tour anyways.

2012.07.10 Iraq Baghdad Sunnis bomb a bus carrying Shiites, killing three and injuring fourteen.
2012.07.09 Afghanistan Kandahar  Two children are among five people pulled into pieces by three Shahid suicide bombers.
2012.07.09 India Gaziabad A Hindu man is the victim of a targeted killing by Muslims.
2012.07.08 Pakistan  Kot Ghulam A Christian laborer is pulled out of his truck and shot point-blank by a Muslim.
2012.07.08 Nigeria Barkin-Ladi Two politicians are among twenty-three Christians, including women and children, slaughtered by Muslims during a funeral for other victims of Islamic terror.
2012.07.08 Afghanistan Arghistan  Eighteen civilians, including women and children, are torn to shreds by Taliban bombers.
2012.07.07 Afghanistan Chora Three children are among six civilians blown to bits by Sunni hardliners.
2012.07.07 Iraq Ramadi   A suicide bomber detonates in the house of a family member, killing ten relatives, most of whom were women.
2012.07.07 Nigeria Kushen  Muslim terrorists attack thirteen Christian villages and massacre eighty innocents.
2012.07.07 Afghanistan Gereshk  A child is dismantled by a Taliban bomb.
2012.07.07 Somalia Shabelle al-Shabaab militants open fire on a passenger bus, killing at least four.
2012.07.06 Iraq Hit Terrorists kill three policemen outside a mosque.
2012.07.06 Iraq Anbar An entire family of four, including two children, bleed to death following a suicide attack on their home.

via:   TROP

Examples of how the Left ridicules people who are against Agenda 21

The Left are blessed with superior knowledge, didn't you know?  The rest of us are circus clowns.
The writer of the article in TheEconomist is such a fucking coward, he/she  has given just the initials of his/her name.  J.F. ... what are you afraid of moron?

...And a former candidate for governor  now running for commissioner of Cobb County, just north of Atlanta, condemned plans to build a jogging and biking trail alongside a highway because, "That's Agenda 21. Bicycles and pedestrian traffic as an alternative form of transportation to the automobile." Hear that, hippies? Every time you walk or bike somewhere instead of driving your car, U Thant wins.....

...are Atlanta's Democratic mayor, Kasim Reed, and Republican attorney-general, Sam Olens, both agents of the United Nations determined to advance the cause of one-world government and outlaw private property? Before you laugh (well, okay, after you finish laughing), this is not a joke. Such concerns come not from the LaRouchey fringe, but from mainstream Georgia Republicans....

And, Jim Galloway of AJC
....The tax and the people behind  it are part of a United Nations plot called Agenda 21.

Laugh if you like. The topic is now center stage in Cobb County, as part of the debate over the penny sales tax, and the contest for chairman of the county commission as well.

Those who aren’t hardcore GOP will need a bit of background. Agenda 21 is also known as the “Rio Declaration on Environment and Development,” and was adopted in 1992 at a conference in Brazil.
In most languages, the report is a vacuous U.N. document that declares the need for a “sustainable” world environment. But to a certain segment of those who speak Republican, it is a secret declaration of war....

I have posted the vid below because Edward Griffin tells us how the US government officers are members of the Council for Foreign  Relations (CFR) and these members are working hard for a one world govt.  It's not a conspiracy theory.  If you like the idea of OWG ... okay, fine...be happy.   But, it's not fine to ridicule people who are against Agenda 21.

The abundance of stupidity from the Useless Nitwits is unbelievable

If only America would come to it's senses and exit the United Nations, this damn entity would collapse like a house of cards that it really is.  If it wants to stay upright, let the Muslim nations and communist countries who are it's real masters anyway, support the monstrosity.  
Canada, PLEASE EXIT from the UN.
 
Anthony Wile writing at RightSideNews:
UN-Water Survey Examines Water Law Reform ... Twenty years ago this June world leaders gathered in Rio de Janeiro for an Earth Summit to develop an action plan for sustainable development.


They discussed a wide variety of topics including climate change, alternative sources of energy to replace fossil fuel and the growing scarcity of water. This June, world leaders will gather once again for the Rio+20 Conference to examine the progress that has been made. – WaterWorld


Here we go again!


Leading proponents of "leveling" are preparing to descend on Brazil for the upcoming Rio+20 Earth Summit, hosted by the United Nations, and one of the items on the menu will be a re-valuation of the UN's muddled Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) initiative.


The results will doubtless be a further weakening of property rights around the world under the guise of communitarianism and outright socialism.


IWRM is part of the UN's overall infamous Agenda 21 "Sustainable Development Initiative" – basically a rhetorical cover for a global abrogation of private ownership. It's a way to impose top-down governmental/elite control of water resources by maintaining that water belongs to everyone.
UN bureaucrats have seized the opportunity to conflate the phony crisis of "water scarcity" with the equally phony crisis of "global warming."


UN officials are forever discovering crises that can only be solved by the UN itself. But there is no world water crisis – except that which is imposed on people via corruption, neglect or outright maliciousness. The world is 70 percent water. And there are plenty of compact water purification devices – more every year as technology advances – that can purify as much water as needed.
Private-market solutions to the water crisis are evident also, to well-meaning people, and have been for centuries. Nothing has changed.


One simple – non-radical solution – is to let individuals bid on water leases. Once people have an investment they have an incentive to keep water clean and maximize the resource. Don't want multinationals involved? Don't let them bid....

Yes, Canada! The sane thing to do is to get out of the lunatic asylum known as the United Nations

The abundance of  harebrained ideas and decisions coming out of the UN are so numerous and so galling that someone has even started a Wikipedia page devoted to it titled:  "Criticism of the United Nations"    and it has taken a life of it's own.  That goes to show how much off the rails the UN has gone and in doing so it has ticked off people around the globe ... people who believe in equality and fairness and have a penchant for the truth ... whatever it may be and wherever it might lead.  People who believe in freedom above everything else.  The UN is nothing but a force to control the freedoms of  individual countries and hence the freedom of individuals.

We as Canadians, have at long last, started to behave more and more like  responsible adults (after decades of Liberal babies at the helm of this great country almost destroyed Canada)  and the common sense thing to do as an adult nation that we have become is to get out of the lunatic asylum that the UN has become.

Brian Lilley, host of The Byline at SUN TV writes:
Three cheers for Larry Miller!   
Miller, the Member of Parliament for Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound, has announced that he wants Canada to review its participation in the United Nations system. Like me, Miller is upset at several actions of the UN including sending its special rapporteur on the “right to food” to investigate Canada, a land where even our poor are often obese. Miller sees that visit and its report condemning Canada and calling for European style social welfare programs as the solution to be a waste of time.
“The United Nations is an organization that was designed to work collectively to solve the major problems facing the world,” said Miller. “If this is the type of action that the UN will be taking then I think that it is high time that we review our participation in the United Nations.”.......
....Personally, I think Miller is on to something but doesn’t go far enough. I have long called for Canada to leave the UN and this latest report will hopefully help more Canadians see this is the right course of action......




The below is from the same Wikipedia entry (for all the countless links visit the wiki page)

In 2004, former ambassador to the UN Dore Gold published a book called Tower of Babble: How the United Nations Has Fueled Global Chaos. The book criticized what it called the organization's moral relativism in the face of (and occasional support of)[1] genocide and terrorism that occurred between the moral clarity of its founding period and the present day. While the UN during its founding period was limited to those nations that declared war on at least one of the Axis powers of World War II, and thus were capable of taking a stand against evil, the modern United Nations has, according to Gold, become diluted to the point where only 75 of the 184 member states during the time of the book's publication "were free democracies, according to Freedom House."[2] He further claimed that this had the effect of tipping the scales of the UN so that the organization as a whole was more amenable to the requirements of dictatorships.[2]
The UN General Assembly decided to hold a moment of silence in honor of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il following his death in 2011. Western diplomats criticized the decision. "An official at the Czech Republic's UN mission said the Czechs did not request a similar moment of silence for Vaclav Havel, the playwright-turned-dissident who died" a day after Kim.[3]

There has been controversy and criticism of the UN organization and its activities since at least the 1950s. In the United States, an early opponent of the UN was the John Birch Society, which began a "get US out of the UN" campaign in 1959, charging that the UN's aim was to establish a "One World Government."
Charles de Gaulle of France criticized the UN, famously calling it le machin ("the whatchamacallit"), and was not convinced that a global security alliance would help in maintaining world peace, preferring that the UN direct defense treaties between countries.[4]...........
....The UNFPA provided aid to Peru's population control program in the mid-to-late '90s, when it was discovered the Peruvian program had been engaged in carrying out coercive sterilizations. The UNFPA was not found directly involved in the scandal, but continued to fund and work with the population control program after the abuses had become public.[5] The issue played a role in the Bush administration's controversial decision in 2002 to cut off funding for the organization.[6]........
........This has led to accusations that the UNSC only addresses the strategic interests and political motives of the permanent members, especially in humanitarian interventions: for example, protecting the oil-rich Kuwaitis in 1991 but poorly protecting resource-poor Rwandans in 1994.[7] Similarly, UN was quick to take a military action through NATO against Libya in 2011 against repressive regime, but as of March 2012 it still hasn't taken any decision on whether to take any action against Syria......





........Issues relating to the state of Israel, the Palestinian people and other aspects of the Arab-Israeli conflict occupy a large amount of debate time, resolutions and resources at the United Nations. Critics such as Dore Gold, Alan Dershowitz, Mark Dreyfus, Robert S. Wistrich, Alan Keyes, and the Anti-Defamation League consider UN attention on Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be excessive.[23][24][25][26][27][28] According to Wistrich, "a third of all critical resolutions passed by [the UN] Human Rights Commission during the past forty years have been directed exclusively at Israel. By way of comparison, there has not been a single resolution even mentioning the massive violations of human rights in China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Syria, or Zimbabwe."[29]
The adoption of UNSCOP's recommendation to partition Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly in 1947[30] was one of the earliest decisions of the UN. According to political commentator Alan Dershowitz, after the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the UN defined the term "refugee" as applied to Palestinian Arabs fleeing Israel in significantly broader terms than it did for other refugees of other conflicts.[31]........
.....The UN has been accused by Dershowitz, human rights activists Elie Wiesel, Anne Bayefsky, and Bayard Rustin, historian Robert S. Wistrich, and feminists Phyllis Chesler and Sonia Johnson of tolerating antisemitic remarks within its walls.[23][26][34][35] Israeli delegates to the UN "have been treated to a sickening litany of anti-Semitic abuse at the General Assembly, in the UN Human Rights Commission, and sometimes even in the Security Council" for decades.[23]
UN conferences throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s often passed resolutions denouncing Zionism. These conferences often did not have anything to do with Middle East politics. UN documents of the period denied the existence of the Jewish people, the history of ancient Israel, the Holocaust, and the notion that Jews deserve the same rights granted to other groups..Wistrich described the 1980 World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women in Copenhagen in his book, A Lethal Obsession:
"Jewish feminists heard truly chilling comments, such as 'The only good Jew is a dead Jew' and 'The only way to rid the world of Zionism is to kill all the Jews.' One eye-witness overheard other delegates saying that the American women's movement had a bad name because its most prominent founding figures ... were all Jewish. The feminist activist Sonia Johnson described the anti-Semitism at the Copenhagen conference as 'over, wild, and irrational.' ... The psychologist and author Phyllis Chesler recorded the savage response when one Jewish woman mentioned that her husband had been shot without a trial in Iraq and that she had to escape to Israel with her children. The place went wild: 'Cuba si! Yankee no! PLO! PLO!' they shouted. 'Israel kills babies and women. Israel must die.'"[23]....
.....According to Dore Gold, Alan Dershowitz, and Robert S. Wistrich, the United Nations has a long history of elevating what it calls "national liberation movements," armed groups who commit violence against civilians to achieve political goals, virtually to the status of civilians.[42][26][43] In 1974 and again in 1988, the UN invited Yasser Arafat to address the General Assembly.[42][44][45][46] Alan Dershowitz accused the UN of allowing states that sponsor terrorism to sit on the Security Council.[47] These visits legitimized the PLO without it "having to renounce terrorism."[48]
In July 1976, Palestinian and German terrorists hijacked an Air France plane headed from France to Israel, landed it in Uganda, and threatened to kill the civilian hostages. Ugandan dictator Idi Amin Dada provided sanctuary for the terrorists in the Entebbe airport. After Israel raided the Ugandan airport and saved most of the hostages, United Nations Secretary General Kurt Waldheim "condemned Israel" for the violation of "Ugandan sovereignty."[49]....



For those of you who are still not convinced that a common-sense nation like Canada who believes in equal rights for every living being on earth, should quit the membership of the United Nations .... do you really and truly want to be associated with this:

UN General Assembly Votes To Allow Gays To Be Executed Without Cause  ...Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people were once again subject to the whims of homophobia and religious and cultural extremism this week, thanks to a United Nations vote that removed “sexual orientation” from a resolution that protects people from arbitrary executions. In other words, the UN General Assembly this week voted to allow LGBT people to be executed without cause.......

And at the risk of sounding like that guy from that annoying ad on TV...   BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE to help convince you that the UN has become a monster with a stealth agenda and the sooner we get out of the Mafioso club the better.:

Phyllis  Schlafly a Constitutional lawyer and  conservative activist and author, writes: At the 55th annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City on September 5-9, 2000, called the Millennium Assembly and Summit, far-reaching plans are underway to turn the corner from a world of sovereign, independent nation-states to a world of disparate peoples subordinated to the supreme authority of the United Nations. These plans call for the total restructuring of the mission and powers of the United Nations.


To achieve this goal, the UN is scheduled to consider at least two actions, by consensus rather than by formal vote: adoption of the Earth Charter, a document whose text has evolved through several drafts since the Earth Summit in 1992, and adoption of a Declaration authorizing a new UN commission to implement recommendations to bring about global governance. Global governance means world government by incremental steps, chipping away at national sovereignty one treaty at a time, one world conference at a time, one UN commission at a time.


A portion of the Millennium Assembly is designated as the Millennium Summit, which President Bill Clinton and 160 heads of state are expected to attend, the largest gathering of heads of state in history. Also meeting at the same time at the New York Hilton will be Mikhail Gorbachev and his State of the World Forum, hoping to help induce heads of state to concur in the Millennium Assembly's historic actions. Gorbachev has been promoting world government ever since his 1992 speech at the Churchill Memorial in Fulton, Missouri, where he called for a "global structure," "a democratically organized world community," a "restructured" United Nations with "armed forces" and "substantial funding," and "some mechanism tying the UN to the world economy."...........

Agenda 21 ....Coming soon to Canada, or maybe already deeply rooted while we slept

Don't bet that what's happening down south won't happen here .... you'll lose the bet. More than 178 countries are signatories to the agreement to change us.

Agenda 21 update at RightSideNews.

If you don't have the time nor the inclination to read through all the info at the above link, read the short one page explanation here.

More info here to show you how involved Canada is in this project:

http://green-agenda.com/agenda21.html

http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/canada/natur.htm

http://www.iisd.org/WORLDSD/CANADA/PROJET/c35.htm

http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/carl_teichrib-6-99.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa0wbbZGB3E         (long discussion on Agenda 21)